Letter: Caroline zoning debates continue
When the first Caroline Town Comprehensive Plan was created, nearly 30 years ago, it very specifically did not include zoning. It was felt, at that point, that we did not yet need additional protection beyond the comprehensive plan, though we realized this could possibly, even likely, come later. I was a Town Board member, having campaigned for the Town’s need for Planning, I pushed for that early effort.
Now, my perspective from the outside is that it seems that the potential establishment of a “General Dollar Store” caused disturbing discussions at the Town Board as they deliberated how to rule on that development. Apparently, it was realized that the Town did not have all the tools to make a fair, reasonable or informed decision, even leading one board member to exclaim “We need zoning!” The Board wisely put into place a moratorium so that they could have the time to build a framework for appropriate decisions of this nature. Hence the creation of the Zoning Commission.
The Commission’s approach has been excellent and I appreciate the hard work of this group. It has a chair and other knowledgeable members, who have great organizing and research skills to have put together a thorough draft. Their process of beginning with a complete coverage of all zoning characteristics and then whittling it down to what Caroline needs seems to have accomplished what I think is needed: a very limited zoning that protects our natural environment and farmlands and maintains the quality and type of life our residents have become accustomed to over the years.
Just as when we first proposed comprehensive planning in the 1990s, the response by a vocal minority of town residents is mostly misinformed. Much of the outcry is about issues that the zoning draft does not promote and that the comprehensive plan has never argued for. The negative energy that is generated is magnified by the national political background of polarization that is inflamed by everyone’s ready access to multiple media avenues. This only adds to our citizens’ anxiety about the future and increases the feelings of lack of control over their lives.
I believe that a majority of Caroline Residents would have little problem with, or would endorse, the zoning commission’s current draft. After the first comprehensive plan reactions in the 1990s, the hubbub quickly died down and people realized that their lives and their comfort with their Caroline community had changed very little. To me, that means that the planning has achieved the oft-stated desire of most all residents: ALLOWING THEIR LIVES TO BE THE SAME or KEEPING THINGS THE WAY THEY ARE.
Ed Cope